SUCCESSFUL MANAGEMENT OF MUMMIFIED FOETUS IN A CROSS BRED HOLSTEIN FRIESIAN HEIFER A CASE REPORT

Authors

  • RAJ KUMARI VISHWAKARMA G.B.P.U.A. & T. pantnagar

Keywords:

Corpus luteum, Crossbred heifer, Holstein Friesian, Mummified foetus, Prolonged gestation period

Abstract

A Holstein Friesian crossbred heifer of around 2.5 years and around 400kg in body weight presented with complaint of not showing any signs of parturition even after completion of full term of pregnancy rather prolonged gestation period, (around 330 days) from the date of artificial insemination. Pregnancy was confirmed at around 90 days after insemination. Physiological parameters of heifer were found within normal range like temperature, heart rate, pulse rate and respiration rate.  Body weight and posture were found normal.  There was history of accidental fall of heifer while running in owner’s crop field, at around 5 months of pregnancy. Though there is no evidence of injury and sickness reported throughout the extended gestation period. Heifer neither showing signs of calving nor of estrous cycle. The animal was examined  per rectally and the observation were; 1) presence of immobile, compact and firm mass without placental fluid or placentomes, in the birth canal, 2) presence of corpus luteum and no fremitus.  While Per vaginal examination revealed, absence of any kind of discharges with completely closed cervix. On the basis of clinical examinations and observations, heifer was diagnosed to be having mummified foetus and was treated successfully with hormonal treatment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

RAJ KUMARI VISHWAKARMA, G.B.P.U.A. & T. pantnagar

1VETERINARY OFFICER, GOVERNMENT VETERINARY HOSPITAL

NAYA GAON PELIO, DEHRADUN, 248007

 (ANIMAL HUSBANDRY DEPARTMENT UTTARAKHAND), INDIA

Corresponding Author’s: e-mail: rajkumari.vet@gmail.com

References

Arthur, G.H., Noakes, D.E., Person, H. and Parkinson, T. J. 1996. Sequelae to embryonic or foetal death. In: Veterinary Reproduction and Obstetrics. 7th edn. Philadelphia; W.B. Saunders. pp.127-128.

Azizunnesa, Sutradhar B. C., Das B.C., Hossain, M. F. and Faruk, M.O. 2010. A case study on Mummified Foetus in a heifer. Univ. j. zool. Rajshahi. Vol. 28, 2010 pp. 61-63

Barth, A. D. 1986. Induced abortion in cattle. In: Current therapy in Theriogenology. 2nd edn. D.A. Morrow, Philadelphia; W. B. Saunders. Pp. 205.

Dabas , V. S. and Chaudhari, C. F. 2011. Management of mummified fetus in a cow. Int J Agro Vet Med Sci . 5:365-7.

Ghanem M. E., Nakao T. and Nishibori, M. 2006. Deficiency of uridine mono-phosphate synthase (DUMPS) and X-chromosome deletion in fetal mummification in cattle. Anim Reprod Sci; 1:45–54.

Ghanem, M. E., Suzuki, T., Akita, M. and Nishibori, M. 2009. Neospora caninum andcomplex vertebral malformation as possible causes of bovine fetal mummification. Can Vet J. 50: 389–392.

Irons, P. C. 1999. Hysterotomy by a colpotomy approach for treatment of foetal mummification in a cow. J S Afr Vet Assoc; 70:127-9.

Jackson S. and Cooper M. J. 1977. The use of cloprostenol for the termination of pregnancy and expulsion of mummified foetus in cattle. Veterinary Record.; 100: 361–363p.

Jana, D. and Ghosh, M. 2014. Foetal mummification owing to severe thermal burn in an indigenous cow. Explor Anim Med Res. 4 (1), 121-123.

Janaway, R.C., Wilson, A.S., Caprio Díaz, G. and Guillen, S. 2008. Taphonomic changes to the buried body in arid environments: an experimental case study in Peru. In: Ritz K, Dawson L, Miller D, editors. Criminal and Environmental Soil Forensics New York: Springer pp 341–356.

Jones, T. J., Hunt, R. D. and King, N. W. 1997. Genital system. In: Veterinary Pathology. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore. pp. 1149-1222.

Kumar, P. R., Prasad, V. D. and Prasad, B. C. 2017a. An Unusual Case of Mummified Foetus in a Doe: A Case Report. Research & Reviews: Journal of Veterinary Science and Technology. 6 (1): 20–21p.

Kumar, P. Ravi., Prasad, B. Chandra., Bose, G. S. C., Prasad, V. Devi and Sreenu, M. 2017. Diagnosis and Management of Fetal Mummification in Cow, International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 6, No 5, 2017, 3044 – 3048

Kumar, P., Purohit, G. N. and Mehta, J. S. 2013. Surgical management of a macerated bovine fetus. Ruminant Sci. 2: 107-108.

Kumar, S., Kumar, sharad., Sharma, U. and Soodan, J. S. 2013. Induced Vaginal Delivery of Mummified Fetus in a Pleuriparous Crossbred Cow. Indian Vet. J. 90 (12): 66 – 67.

Lefebvre, R. C. 2015. Fetal mummification in the major domestic species: current perspectives on causes and management. Veterinary Medicine: Research and Reports.6: 233–244.

Mahajan, M. and Sharma A. 2002. Haematic mummification due to umbilical cord torsion in a cow: a case report. Ind Vet J; 79:1186-87.

Moore, A. A. and Richardson G. F. 1995. Uterine torsion and fetal mummification in a cow. Can Vet J; 36:705-6.

Roberts, S. J. 1962. The enigma of fetal mummification. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 140: 691–698.

Roberts, S. J. 1971. In: Veterinary obstetrics and genital diseases: theriogenology. 2nd ed. New Delhi: CBS Publishers and Distributors;. pp 170-174.

Roberts, S. J. 2012. Veterinary obstetrics and genital diseases. 2nd ed. New Delhi: CBS Publishers and Distributors; pp 213-233.

Tutt, C.L. 1997. Postpartum mummification of a co-twin fetus in a Cameroon dwarf goat doe. Vet Rec., 140: 229–231.

Downloads

Published

2021-02-01

How to Cite

VISHWAKARMA, R. K. (2021). SUCCESSFUL MANAGEMENT OF MUMMIFIED FOETUS IN A CROSS BRED HOLSTEIN FRIESIAN HEIFER A CASE REPORT. LIFE SCIENCES LEAFLETS, 132. Retrieved from https://petsd.org/ojs/index.php/lifesciencesleaflets/article/view/1592